Brazil Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Report 2018

By , in PR PR Economy on .

General Report Contents

  • Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
  • Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
  • Section on recent mergers & acquisitions

Brazil imports minimally invasive devices, mostly from American and European manufacturers. However, the U.S. dollar has seen strong growth recently, which has made it harder for local importers to meet the prices of these products, which are relatively expensive compared to standard technologies. As a result, pricing across the Brazilian economy has seen a downturn. The result is that it has been less profitable for companies to import MIS devices and this has stunted market growth. However, prices have begun to stabilize and it is hoped that these trends will begin to reverse, stimulating growth across MIS segments.

Key Topics Covered:

Executive Summary
Brazil Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Market Trends
Market Developments
Markets Included
Key Report Updates
Version History

1. Research Methodology

2. Disease Overview
2.1 Introduction
2.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
2.1.1.1 Disc Herniation
2.1.1.2 Stenosis
2.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis
2.1.1.4 Arthritis
2.1.2 Spinal Deformities
2.1.2.1 Scoliosis
2.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis
2.1.3 Trauma and Tumor
2.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
2.1.4.1 Osteoporosis
2.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures

3. Product Assessment
3.1 Product Portfolios
3.1.1 Cervical Fixation
3.1.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation
3.1.1.1.1 Constrained
3.1.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained
3.1.1.1.3 Dynamic
3.1.1.1.4 Bioresorbable
3.1.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation
3.1.2 Thoracolumbar Fixation
3.1.2.1 Traditional Systems
3.1.2.2 Minimally Invasive Systems
3.1.3 Interbody Devices
3.1.3.1 Approaches
3.1.3.1.1 Alif
3.1.3.1.2 Plif
3.1.3.1.3 Tlif
3.1.3.1.4 Minimally Invasive Plif
3.1.3.1.5 Minimally Invasive Tlif
3.1.3.1.6 Llif
3.1.3.1.7 Olif
3.1.3.1.8 Cervical
3.1.3.1.9 Vbr/Corpectomy
3.1.3.2 Materials
3.1.3.2.1 Metal
3.1.3.2.2 Peek
3.1.3.2.3 Machined Bone Allograft
3.1.4 Motion Preservation Devices
3.1.4.1.1 Artificial Discs
3.1.4.1.2 Dynamic Stabilization
3.1.4.1.3 Nucleus Replacement
3.1.4.1.4 Facet Arthroplasty
3.1.5 Spinous Process Fixation
3.1.6 Facet Fixation
3.1.7 Mis Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
3.1.8 Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices
3.1.8.1.1 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
3.1.8.1.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Including Kyphoplasty
3.1.9 Spine Endoscopes

3. 3.1.10 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices
3.1 Fda Recalls
3.1.1 Alphatec Spine
3.1.2 Depuy Synthes
3.1.3 Medtronic
3.1.4 Orthofix
3.1.5 Stryker
3.1.6 Zimmer Biomet
3.2 Clinical Trials
3.2.1 Depuy Synthes
3.2.2 Globus Medical
3.2.3 K2M
3.2.4 Medtronic
3.2.5 Stryker
3.2.6 Zimmer Biomet

4. Brazil Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market
4.1 Introduction
4.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
4.1.2.1 Percutaneous Mis Systems
4.1.2.2 Retractor-Based Mis Systems
4.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation
4.1.4 Facet Fixation
4.1.5 Mis Spine Endoscopes
4.2 Currency Exchange Rate
4.3 Market Overview
4.4 Trend Analysis By Segment
4.5 Drivers and Limiters
4.5.1 Market Drivers
4.5.2 Market Limiters
4.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis
4.7 Company Profiles
4.7.1 Alphatec Spine
4.7.2 Depuy Synthes
4.7.3 Globus Medical
4.7.4 K2M
4.7.5 Medtronic
4.7.6 Orthofix
4.7.7 Stryker
4.7.8 Zimmer Biomet
4.8 Swot Analysis
4.8.1 Depuy Synthes
4.8.2 Djo Global
4.8.3 Globus Medical
4.8.4 Joimax Gmbh
4.8.5 K2M Inc
4.8.6 Karl Storz
4.8.7 Medtronic
4.8.8 Merit Medical Systems, Inc
4.8.9 Nuvasive
4.8.10 Orthofix
4.8.11 Paradigm Spine
4.8.12 Richard Wolf
4.8.13 Si-Bone
4.8.14 Spinal Kinetic
4.8.15 Stryker
4.8.16 Zimmer Biomet

5. Procedure Numbers
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Procedure Numbers
5.2.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Procedures
5.2.1.1 Miplif Procedures
5.2.1.2 Mitlif Procedures
5.2.1.3 Llif Procedures
5.2.1.4 Olif Procedures
5.2.2 Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.2.1 Retractor Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.2.2 Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.3 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures
5.2.4 Facet Fixation Procedures
5.2.5 Spinal Endoscope Procedures

6. Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market
6.1 Introduction
6.1.1 Approach Types
6.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.5 Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.2 Market Overview
6.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
6.3.1 Total Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market
6.3.2 Miplif Market
6.3.3 Mitlif Market
6.3.4 Llif Market
6.3.5 Olif Market
6.4 Drivers and Limiters
6.4.1 Market Drivers
6.4.2 Market Limiters
6.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

7. Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 Percutaneous Mis Systems
7.1.2 Retractor-Based Mis Systems
7.2 Market Overview
7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
7.3.1 Total Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market
7.3.2 Retractor Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market
7.3.3 Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market
7.4 Drivers and Limiters
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

8. Spinous Process Fixation Market
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
8.3 Drivers and Limiters
8.3.1 Market Drivers
8.3.2 Market Limiters
8.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis

9. Facet Fixation Market
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
9.3 Drivers and Limiters
9.3.1 Market Drivers
9.3.2 Market Limiters
9.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis

10. Spine Endoscope Market
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Market Overview
10.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
10.3.1 Spine Endoscope Market
10.3.2 Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market
10.4 Drivers and Limiters
10.4.1 Market Drivers
10.4.2 Market Limiters
10.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

11. Minimally Invasive Instrumentation Market
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
11.3 Drivers and Limiters
11.3.1 Market Drivers
11.3.2 Market Limiters
11.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Companies Mentioned

  • Zimmer Biomet
  • Medtronic
  • DePuy Synthes
  • NuVasive
  • Globus Medical
  • Ulrich Medical
  • Orthofix
  • Aesculap
  • K2M
  • Stryker

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/k23pzn/brazil_minimally?w=5

About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets
Laura Wood, Senior Manager
[email protected]  

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470
For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630
For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907
Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

Cision View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/brazil-minimally-invasive-spinal-implants-market-report-2018-300592626.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

Related Links

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

The following two tabs change content below.
Marcus Clinker

Marcus Clinker

Marcus is a reporter on the Political Capital team focusing on money in politics. Before joining Daily Telescope, he worked as a researcher and writer for the Institute for Northern Studies at Ohio State University and as a freelance journalist in Portalnd, having been published by over 20 outlets including NPR, the Center for Media and Democracy,The Huffington Post, Salon, Truthout and VICE.com.
%d bloggers like this: